Alberta’s Court of Appeal Weighs In on the “Use and Operation” of an Automobile

By now most people in the insurance business in Canada have become familiar with the two Supreme Court of Canada decisions rendered dealing with the use and operation of an automobile: Citadel General Assurance Co. v. Vytlingam [2007 S. C. C. 46] and Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Co. v. Herbison [2007 S. C. C. 47]. In […]

By Cheryl Canning | January 31, 2008

6 min read

Preferred Collision Repair Shops:

Is it enough to produce quality data to quantify performance?

By David Gambrill | January 31, 2008

6 min read

Injuries did not arise from indirect use of automobiles

The Supreme Court of Canada has sided with insurers in two cases that threatened to expand the definition of an injury “arising directly or indirectly from the use or operation of an automobile.” Inboth CitadelGeneralAssuranceCo. v. Vytlingham and LumbermensMutual Casualty Company v. Herbison, Canada’shighcourtfoundthatcar-relatedactivities were in each case “severable” from the tort that caused the […]

November 30, 2007

2 min read