Canadian Underwriter

Category: Claims

  • Did your client just buy a stolen car?

    Did your client just buy a stolen car?

    Car for sale. Cheap!

    While it’s eased over the past year, Canada’s auto theft rate remains above historical levels.

    In the first half of 2025, Insurance Bureau of Canada data shows 12,887 theft claims were filed by insureds, with losses totalling $361.5 million. Going back 10 years, theft claims had reached 8,567 and claims losses were $120.5 million for the first half of 2015. That’s roughly 50% and 200% respectively below the same period in 2025, but still high.

    Demonstrating the issue’s staying power, Canada’s federal government announced late today it will make investments in Canadian‑developed technologies designed to prevent auto theft. “Auto theft remains serious and evolving threat to public safety, and today’s announcement marks another meaningful step in advancing on the National Action Plan to Combat Auto Theft…,” says IBC vice president for Federal Affairs, Liam McGuinty, in a statement.

    Helping clients

    Beyond the claims problems vehicle theft creates for clients and insurers, it raises the chances that one of your clients may unknowingly buy a stolen vehicle. It’s a genuine risk for used-car buyers, says Steven Harris, a licensed insurance broker who provides commentary for LowestRates.ca.

    He notes used car buyers often focus on a vehicle’s price and condition and aren’t always paying attention to the financial consequences of the vehicle turning out to have been stolen. 

    Related: How planned registration upgrades can trim Alberta auto theft

    “What surprises many buyers is how little protection exists once the sale is complete,” he says. “If a vehicle is later identified as stolen, it can still be seized, even if the buyer had no idea. Recovering the money after that can be extremely difficult.” 

    Harris points out insurance is designed to protect vehicle owners when their own cars are stolen. It isn’t intended to protect the purchasers of cars that were stolen from other owners. “If a vehicle has been re-VINned or reported stolen, it becomes an ownership issue rather than a typical insurance claim, and coverage eligibility could be at risk,” he says. 

    “That’s why the verification steps matter so much before making the purchase.”  

    Years ago, stolen cars offered buyers telltale signs – marks around door keyholes suggesting forced entry, repairs around the steering column or undersides of dashboards where damage from hotwiring was repaired, and damage to the body or interior from joyriders.

    Today, car thefts are more high tech. Thieves hijack an owner’s key signal and then clone a new fob. And with the help of expert cosmetic teams (and occasionally public servants) vehicle identification numbers (VINs) are changed to eliminate the trail back to the original theft. All this can make stolen cars appear legitimate.

    Related: Auto insurers urge governments to close Re-VINning loopholes

    Still, says Harris, not all signs of theft can be erased. So buyers need to go through a few steps:

    • Odometer readings should be consistent with the car’s state of repair. A worn out vehicle with low mileage is a red flag. 
    • The VIN on an ownership permit should match the number plate that’s visible both under the windshield and on the driver’s door frame. Look closely for scratches, loose plates, or numbers that don’t fully match. 
    • Check the name on the vehicle’s registration against a government-issued ID from the seller. Ontario provides a Used Vehicle Information Package that gives buyers an ownership history. A buyer should make sure no loans are registered against the vehicle. 
    • Look up the VIN in the Canadian Police Information Centre database. It will show if the car’s been reported stolen. And report providers like CARFAX can also show irregularities, like a different owner than the one the buyer has met with.
    • Buyers should beware of below-market prices. Thieves often want to onload the goods and get the cash.
    • Buyers going through with a transaction should complete the sale at a financial institution using a bank draft to document the payment trail. 

  • How Facility Association managed trucking oversubscriptions

    How Facility Association managed trucking oversubscriptions

    Truck crashed into a low overpass

    Ontario’s 2023 changes making direct compensation for property damage coverage (DCPD) optional meant Facility Association (FA) “unwillingly [became] the underpriced market of choice for long-haul trucks carrying only liability and accident benefits,” Saskia Matheson, the association’s president and CEO, told FA’s Mar. 11 annual general meeting.

    “Not only did this represent a growing burden on our industry, where trucks already well served in the regular market were being moved into FA for cheaper prices,” she said, “but the consequence of inexperienced drivers operating minimally insured vehicles plays havoc both with the trucking industry, and the communities in which they drive.”

    FA is a residual market providing insurance for high-risk or hard-to-place customers, and operates as a non-profit, unincorporated association of insurers.

    Related: Alberta truckers insured by Facility Association face steep rate increase

    Matheson said that “after extensive efforts,” FA was able work with the Financial Services Regulatory Authority of Ontario (FSRA) on a solution to re-balance that segment.

    An FA spokesperson noted the Ontario InterUrban (long-haul trucking) issue created a need to explore options to slow down the growth FA was experiencing.

    “Following an extensive process, FA has received approval from FSRA to re-balance the [bodily injury and property damage] BI/PD portion [which are mandatory coverages] of the InterUrban premium,” FA’s Derek Tupling told CU.

    “Effective July 1, 2026, for new business and renewals, the BI/PD portion of the InterUrban premium will increase by 40%. Following the implementation, FA will closely monitor its renewals and new business to determine if it is having the necessary effect.”

    Addressing Alberta

    Later in her remarks, Matheson pointed out market imbalances can also shift the other way. Last year, rules prohibiting placement of certain risks in FA ran up against Alberta’s ongoing rate cap. This led to market restrictions on availability for Section C coverage – an optional Alberta benefit that addresses vehicle damage.

    “As a consequence, there were vehicle owners and drivers who needed but could not obtain full coverage,” she told the AGM.  

    FA worked with the province’s brokers association, Superintendent of Insurance’s office and Alberta Automobile Insurance Rate Board to introduce changes to FA criteria allowing those underserved customers to find policies in FA.

    “We are optimistic that as the Care First model rolls out in Alberta, this measure will not remain necessary,” she added. “In the interim, we focus on ensuring availability while we also address adequate price in the constant work to maintain that balance.”

    Related: Clients struggling to secure physical damage coverage in Alberta

    Other key points from Matheson’s comments at FA’s annual general meeting:

    • In 2025, FA oversaw transfer of $1.4 billion in written premium in the risk sharing pool, up 11% from 2024.
    • Last January’s increase in grid prices led to a 21% drop in vehicle counts in the grid pool. Simultaneously, there was an 8% increase in vehicles in the non-grid pool, and a 16% gain in premium. “These numbers reflect greater use of the Alberta non-grid pool in the face of rising industry loss ratios, while in Ontario, we saw a reduction in vehicle counts in the pool as insurers took higher prices to respond to trends in bodily injury losses,” Matheson said.
    • For FA’s residual market, the association provided coverage for more than 122,000 vehicles nationwide, reflecting over $520 million in written premium (63% of the vehicle count and 70% of the premium are non-private passenger risks).
    • Premium in 2025 declined slightly from the prior year, although vehicle count increased. Most of that increase came from Ontario and Nova Scotia.
    • In Nova Scotia, FA private passenger market share has grown steadily for five years, amid rising claims costs and FA rates being cheaper than many regular markets.

  • Invasive grasses may pose deadly risk post-wildfire, UBC researcher says

    Invasive grasses may pose deadly risk post-wildfire, UBC researcher says

    Helicopter pilots watch as a controlled fire burns on Mount McLean in an attempt to reduce the amount of fuel for a wildfire burning on the mountain in Lillooet, B.C., on Tuesday August 4, 2009. THE CANADIAN PRESS/Darryl Dyck

    A University of British Columbia researcher says invasive grasses are creeping into burnt landscapes years after wildfires and could fuel massive future fires that put people’s lives at risk. 

    Jennifer Grenz, an assistant professor in the department of forest resources management, co-authored a study that focuses on the aftermath of the McKay Creek wildfire, a 46,000 hectare fire that burned near Lillooet in 2021 during the record-breaking heat dome. 

    The study, published this month in the journal “Fire Ecology,” took place in B.C.’s southern Interior, a region that includes dry forests and grassland.

    Grenz says that while native plants were slow to recover, invasive grasses like cheatgrass are starting to grow into lower-elevation areas where people live. 

    She says the cheatgrass dries out quickly and acts like kindling, creating a “fuel highway” that causes fire to spread faster, and noted that similar grasses contributed to deadly wildfires in Hawaii in 2023. 

    Grenz says the grasses could lead to the next major wildfire in B.C., and recommends the province create its own department with a dedicated budget to tackle invasive plants. 


    This report by The Canadian Press was first published March 20, 2026. 

  • Do advanced driving systems really mean more cars get totalled?

    Do advanced driving systems really mean more cars get totalled?

    Car using lane keeping and crash sensors on highway

    Stories abound about how costly components for advanced driving systems (blind spot sensors, lane-keeping technology, etc.) are leading to more vehicles being totalled.

    Canadian P&C professionals commenting on high claims costs routinely cite ‘the $10,000 bumper’ or ‘the $3,000 side mirror’ as hallmarks of why personal auto insured losses are out of control.

    But an appraiser tells Canadian Underwriter the reality is more nuanced.

    “The [issue] I find is that, at the shop level, we can’t always clear or recalibrate the codes for the [sensors] so [certain cars] have to be sent out to a dealer,” says Mark Fernandez, national director of operations at Accurate Auto Appraisal. “And that’s prolonging the repair time, because it’s going to be another day, or two days, for this calibration.”

    For example, when a bumper is damaged, sometimes there’s problem with a sensor on the side of the bumper that wasn’t impacted during the accident. The sensor itself checks out as fine, but if that sensor is linked to one that’s damaged on the opposite side of the vehicle, it often can’t be recalibrated and will need to be replaced.

    Related: Are long, pandemic-era car repair timelines making a comeback?

    Fernandez gives the example of a luxury car that was hit on its left corner. “Everything cleared on the scans [in our shop]. But the customer took the car out, then brought it back and said, ‘The dash lit up like a Christmas tree.’”

    That car had to go to a dealership, because the diagnostic machines at Fernandez’s shop didn’t have manufacturer-specific features needed to troubleshoot the problem. He notes many luxury vehicle makers provide significantly more detailed information to their own repair centres than they do to independent providers.

    “It turned out we had to change an undamaged sensor because ‘that’s what the codes state’ for a repair to that vehicle,” he says. “It was nowhere near the impact area, but it could still be affected. The vibration [from the accident] could send it out.

    “Until all body shops have a fully-trained calibration technician, we’re at the mercy of the dealership. [Most] shops will have people who know [a lot], but can’t know every vehicle. Some require a different computer that only the dealer has.”

    Body shop talk

    Beyond diagnostics, some routine repairs, like resurfacing damaged areas or painting a bumper to match the bodywork, can cause issues with components like parking sensors.

    “There are sensors behind the bumper cover, which can lead to a whole issue because some OEM [original equipment manufacturer] specifications say, ‘no repair material over it,’ [so] you can only paint or clearcoat.”

    That means if the bumper is scratched or gouged, the repair shop is unable to use body fillers and instead must replace the whole bumper. “It can be $7,000 for just the plastic cover. When you add in all the clips and sensors and radars, just the bumper can become expensive,” he says.

    Related: How a few dollars worth of parts can total a vehicle

    Also, the price tag varies based on the make and model. Fernandez says bumper sensors are “relatively inexpensive,” but there is a range – from $100 for some lower-cost car models to $2,500 for high-end luxury vehicles.

    All that translates into a sliding scale when it comes to deciding whether a vehicle should be totalled. A more entry level vehicle (which these days can range from $30,000 and up) can have a repair involving parts like bumper sensors performed for around $4,000 and remain financially viable for an insurer and client.

    And although it’s true bumpers (complete with sensors) can sometimes cost upwards of $10,000 to replace, those examples apply to luxury vehicles carrying six-figure price tags. So that repair is affordable (and not a total loss) when the high value of the car is taken into consideration, Fernandez tells CU.

    It’s all relative. But, he adds, vehicle age is also a factor. Once a car passes the 10-year mark, repairs requiring costlier components can exceed the book value of the car.

  • Why some Ontarians pay out of pocket for minor collisions

    Why some Ontarians pay out of pocket for minor collisions

    Small dent in read fender

    Rising auto insurance premiums in Ontario have some vehicle owners opting to pay for minor collisions out of pocket rather than reporting them to insurers.

    “With premiums where they are, many assume reporting a minor collision will automatically raise their rate. That isn’t necessarily true in Ontario,” says Steven Harris, a licensed insurance broker who provides commentary to LowestRates.ca.

    “There are specific protections for qualifying minor accidents, and it’s important to understand how those rules apply before making a decision.”

    Related: Are long, pandemic-era car repair timelines making a comeback?

    Here are some things parties to a minor accident should consider before handling it themselves: 

    • Sometimes it’s illegal not to report an accident to police. This includes cases of injury or death or if there is “combined property damage exceeding $5,000 across all vehicles or property involved,” Harris notes. This threshold is separate from an insurer’s reporting requirements. 
    • A driver reporting an accident does not mean they’ve filed a claim. “Notifying an insurer about an accident is different from submitting a claim for payment,” he adds. “An incident can be reported to keep the insurer informed without requesting reimbursement.” 
    • Ontario has a protection rule for minor accidents, which means insurers can’t raise premiums for “one qualifying minor at-fault accident if there are no injuries, no insurer payout, and damage is under $2,000 per vehicle and paid by the at-fault driver,” says Harris. The protection applies once every three years. 
    • Injuries aren’t always evident immediately following an accident. In Ontario, an injured person has two years bring a claim. If a driver reports the accident, it creates a paper trail that can be relied upon if anyone involved reports an injury after the fact. 
    • Minor accidents that qualify for Ontario’s protection rule might not result in a surcharge with a client’s current insurer. At-fault incidents, however, can still appear on claims history reporting. When clients change coverage the new insurer may factor that into pricing. 

    “Understanding the thresholds, the protections in place, and how an accident is recorded provides far more clarity than reacting in the moment,” says Harris. 

    Related: EV premiums are all over the map, auto insurance quotes suggest

    What’s more, a new Rates.ca report finds auto insurance premiums make up the lion’s share of insurance costs for households in Toronto (70%) and Hamilton (65%).

    “Between 2022 and 2025, the average auto premium increased from $3,453 to $3,997 in Toronto and from $2,531 to $3,096 in Hamilton,” the rate aggregator says in a press release. For Toronto, when auto and home premiums are combined, they jumped from $4,850 annually in 2022 to $5,693 in 2025. 

    “Insurance prices reflect the risks insurers see in each market,” says Daniel Ivans, who provides expert commentary for Rates.ca. “In cities like Toronto and Hamilton, higher theft rates, heavier traffic, and more frequent claims all contribute to higher insurance costs for households.”

    The report also finds Ontario premium growth rates vary widely. Toronto’s increase during the 2022 to 2025 study period was 17%. Meanwhile Windsor drivers saw a 34% rise, those in London and Ottawa both saw a 35% hike, and Oshawa drivers saw 37% increases.

    Plus, 75% of Canadians are reporting higher premiums over the past two years. Sixty-three percent say they’ve taken steps to lower premiums – including shopping their policies around (40%), asking existing insurers for discounts (30%) and modifying their coverage (21%).

    In some cases, reducing coverage to save money can raise risk levels in the event of a major claim against a driver. “Reducing coverage increases your exposure,” says Ivans.  

  • Jasper wildfire rebuild: Challenges persist for local businesses

    Jasper wildfire rebuild: Challenges persist for local businesses

    Work continues to assess, repair and rebuild as some residents return to Jasper, Alberta on Monday August 19, 2024. Wildfire caused evacuations and widespread damage in the National Park and Jasper townsite. THE CANADIAN PRESS/Amber Bracken

    As the second anniversary of the 2024 Jasper Wildfire approaches, time and money has long run out for some businesses, while others are scrambling to survive.

    “What we are seeing,” says Rob de Pruis, national director of consumer and industry relations for the Insurance Bureau of Canada, “is that when you have the total loss of an entire business, you may be underinsured or have insufficient funds to completely rebuild that full property.”

    In its most recent update, the Jasper Recovery Coordination Center (JRCC) notes a mere 4% of the 374 fire-destroyed properties are complete and occupant-ready. Although this figure includes residential dwellings, it also includes businesses.

    Ranging from home-based enterprises to oil sands operations, needs and coverage vary widely.

    Beyond coverage for the buildings themselves — which does not include the same type of guaranteed replacement costs available in home insurance — coverage for both business interruption and lost revenue comes with both dollar and time limitations.

    Consequence of choice

    To save premium, some businesses make an informed decision at the time of purchase to opt out of certain coverages or intentionally reduce limits to help save premium, as de Pruis notes. In Jasper, those decisions have left some businesses unable to ride out the proverbial storm.

    Business interruption coverage, for example, is typically purchased for 12-, 24-, and 36-month periods. Business clients opting for 12 months felt the impact about eight months ago. Those selecting 24 months will soon see their protection expire, too.

    Also in the news: Quebec broker association’s wish list for province’s government

    When coverage runs out or is insufficient, business owners are left to figure out how to rebuild. This may mean securing a new mortgage or using some other type of investment — if they have one, says de Pruis.

    “Will a business be able to continue if they’re not receiving any revenue from insurance, or if they haven’t had a chance yet to build and reestablish their business in a different location?” says de Pruis. “In some cases, they simply won’t have the finances they need to continue and will, unfortunately, fail.”

    It’s not easy to determine the number of businesses facing this situation. Unlike auto insurance, property insurance is not tracked. Although insurance may be contractually required for those with a mortgage, it is not a legislated obligation.

    “We don’t have information on how many people have insurance versus those who don’t,” explains de Pruis. “We also don’t have the numbers as to whether a business is fully insured or partially insured, and what that looks like.”

    Impact of rule revision

    Increased replacement costs are also having an impact on the rebuild in Jasper. Supply and demand are at play, and not all labour and materials required are available locally. This has added to both the cost and duration of rebuild projects, as has the need to use some very specific building materials.

    “It took some time, but eventually [the Municipality of Jasper] changed the local building requirements,” de Pruis says. “You’re no longer allowed to build with combustible materials.”

    On July 25, 2025, the Town of Jasper Land Use Policy was updated to align with latest wildfire-resilient materials guidance.

    Under Section 7.01, for example, all structures must be constructed or reconstructed with non-combustible surface perimeters, and attachments such as decks have to be surfaced with fire-resistant materials meeting Class A standards — the highest level of fire resistance available.

    For businesses that do survive, the built-in resiliency associated with the mandated use of Class A materials will certainly help mitigate future risk.

    However, insurance providers still need to work closely with businesses to ensure the most appropriate coverages and limits moving forward, based not only on price, but also on best practices and lessons learned.

  • Lytton wildfire rebuild lacked legal framework, B.C. auditor says

    Lytton wildfire rebuild lacked legal framework, B.C. auditor says

    Structures that were destroyed by wildfire are seen in Lytton, B.C., on Tuesday, June 14, 2022. THE CANADIAN PRESS/Darryl Dyck

    A report from the office of British Columbia’s auditor general says the province expected the Village of Lytton to lead its own recovery from the fast-moving wildfire that destroyed most of the community and killed two people in June 2021.

    But it says officials with the village in B.C.’s southern Interior were “immediately overwhelmed by the magnitude of devastation” wrought by the fire and lacked the necessary staff and funds, prompting the province to step in.

    Still, the auditor’s report says the B.C. government itself didn’t have a comprehensive legal framework to guide disaster recovery at the time.

    It says B.C.’s legislation and policies in 2021 were “not sufficient to guide the complex and unprecedented recovery of a whole community.”

    The auditor’s report also says B.C.’s Emergency Program Act was “silent” on the role of Indigenous Peoples at the time of the fire, and the lack of collaboration between the village and Nlaka’pamux governing bodies was a “missed opportunity.”

    The report released Tuesday notes the B.C. government has since passed new emergency and disaster management legislation, including requirements for local authorities to work with Indigenous governments on emergency plans.

    Premier David Eby says the new law requires conversations between local governments and First Nations to happen before a potential emergency, marking a shift from how things were done before the fire that swept through Lytton.

    “This hopefully will be just one of the many improvements that have come about, hard lessons learned through … the terrible loss of property that took place in Lytton following that devastating fire,” Eby told an unrelated news conference.

    Eby says the province would respond to the auditor’s report later Tuesday.

    The auditor’s report says the community lost its grocery store, bank, post office, school, health centre and electrical infrastructure in the blaze, along with dozens of homes and “nearly all” municipal records, including building and planning bylaws.

    After the flames subsided, it says the land was covered in debris and contaminated by soot and ash containing asbestos and heavy metals, including lead.

    The report says archeological work in the rebuilding process following the deadly and destructive blaze was a “significant source of tension,” which the province “could not mitigate,” despite providing funds to the village to help offset the costs.

    The auditor’s report says B.C. initially provided money directly to the village to support its recovery, but after receiving incomplete spending and progress reports, it shifted to a reimbursement-based funding model set to end in 2027.

    In total, the province distributed more than $51 million to the village over the auditor’s examination period between June 30, 2021 and March 2025.

    The report identifies issues for the province to consider as it implements the new disaster management law, including anticipating recovery in communities with low cash reserves, agreements with Indigenous governments and developing a framework for assessing communities’ capacity to lead their own recovery.

    The review was prompted by concerns raised by the public and members of the B.C. legislature about the progress and cost of recovery, the report notes.

    This report by The Canadian Press was first published March 17, 2026.

  • What’s the outlook for Cat bonds in 2026?

    What’s the outlook for Cat bonds in 2026?

    ‘s

    Car stuck in ice and water after the overflow of a river flood besides

    The market for insurance-linked securities (ILS) remains on a growth track in in 2026, although it may be slower than last year as investors take profits rather than redeploy capital into a softening market, says a new report from AM Best.

    And in Canada, TD Insurance is doubling down after it issued Canada’s first Cat bond last year.

    Capacity is climbing, and the segment “has grown beyond its niche role to become more established with returning sponsors and cedants playing a role,” the ratings agency notes.

    Investors are increasingly interested in the diversification of ILS offerings, including cover for “more risks based across perils and geographies,” says Emmanuel Modu, managing director of AM Best. And that includes Canada.

    Related: De-clawed Cats hiss in 2025, but claims payouts don’t scare anyone

    “A large number of catastrophe bonds have historically covered Canadian exposures combined with U.S. exposures,” Matt Tuite, director of insurance-linked securities at AM Best, tells Canadian Underwriter. Cat bonds are ILS instruments, in which insurance companies keep the bond investors’ money to pay claims if a predefined disaster risk takes place during the period for which the bond is issued.  

    “In early 2025, TD Insurance issued the first 144A property Cat bond focused exclusively on Canadian exposures,” Tuite said. “TD Insurance came back to the Cat bond market in early 2026 to sponsor another Canada-focused Cat bond. These issuances are examples of a broader trend of new sponsors bringing further diversification to the Cat bond market.”

    The report notes Cat bond market activity in 2025 “was marked by many high-profile transactions that underscored the market’s continued evolution.”

    In early February, TD Insurance successfully sponsored its second catastrophe bond, a year after becoming the first Canadian insurer to sponsor a bond solely focused on Cat perils in Canada.

    The MMIFS Re Ltd. Series 2026-1 cat bond provides TDI insurance companies additional reinsurance capacity through a multi-year risk transfer of $115 million aggregate protection against named storms, earthquakes, severe convective storms, winter storms and wildfires. The proceeds are invested in Canadian dollar-denominated European Bank for Reconstruction and Development notes.

    Related: Insurer secures second Canadian Cat bond

    Beyond increased ILS issuance globally, AM Best notes the deals represent an expansion in the type of perils, geographic regions, and sponsors accessing the market. “This serves as an encouraging indicator of the market’s long-term sustainability and growth, demonstrating that diverse insurers can effectively use Cat bonds for risk transfer,” says the ratings agency.

    A recent estimate assembled jointly by AM Best and Guy Carpenter projects the ILS market reached US$120 billion at the end of 2025, up from US$107 billion at the end of 2024. Specifically, the 144A property catastrophe bond market reached US$57 billion outstanding when 2025 ended. That’s a year-over-year increase of nearly US$12 billion over 2024. And 144A property catastrophe bonds represent about half the ILS market’s capacity.

    Right now, AM Best says, the catastrophe bond market is softening, which has investors looking for other options to generate higher yields. Their report notes reinsurance demand continues to increase due to expanding insured exposures, while the potential for more severe and frequent NatCats is pushed higher by climate change.

  • Quebec broker association’s wish list for province’s government

    Quebec broker association’s wish list for province’s government

    Quebec legislative assembly building

    Quebec’s broker association is working and speaking with the provincial government on a number of files, including rising climate-related losses, floodplain mapping, cyber risk and maintaining a strong independent brokerage network.

    Government support is critical for insurability and sustainability in Quebec and across Canada, says Lucie Fréchette, president of the Regroupement des cabinets de courtage d’assurance du Québec (RCCAQ).

    “It’s no longer isolated incidents; it’s now a fact of life,” Fréchette says in an interview with Canadian Underwriter. “So, government support is incredibly important in increasing the sustainability of the insurability of the market by fostering…encouragement to sustainable building practices.”

    RCCAQ even asked the government to implement a government subsidy for consumers and businesses that choose to rebuild in a sustainable fashion, such as through home renovations and better insulation, she adds.

    Fréchette spoke with Canadian Underwriter after Quebec Premier François Legault announced on Jan. 14 that he would resign following the election of his successor. CU asked what the Coalition Avenir Québec (CAQ) leader’s resignation means for provincial brokers and consumers, and which files the broker association is working on with CAQ.

    Fréchette says RCCAQ has very good working relationships with various government officials and expects continuity. “The RCCAQ through the years has worked with successive governments for decades, and so our approach is consistent.”

    As for files, the broker association is also asking the provincial government to move forward on creating standard floodplain maps. This is reportedly in progress, and there is collaboration with the federal government on floodplain maps.

    “We want the government to come in and actually implement policies, so land use, building policy alignment [and] clear disaster compensation rules,” Fréchette says. “For every dollar that you spend in prevention, you reduce public spend after.”

    Increasing education for companies and consumers on the importance of cyber risk is also on RCCAQ’s radar. “Everywhere, it’s one of those things that people think won’t happen to me, for some reason,” she says. Only when there is a breach in an industry in which a client knows somebody do people seem to realize a breach can happen to them, Fréchette adds.

    Related: Why Quebec’s broker association calls replacement insurance changes ‘problematic’

    “Another file that’s incredibly important to us is the maintaining of a strong, independent brokerage network in Quebec,” she says.

    “It’s good, not only for the broker network, but also for Quebec’s economy as a whole, because brokerages are small businesses that are implemented in all regions of Quebec…and they are good corporate citizens,” she adds. “They offer good jobs in their communities, and they offer access to independent, impartial insurance advice for their local communities and their local businesses.

    “Quebec is the only region where an insurance company cannot own 100% of a brokerage and we are keen on maintaining that.”

    Quebec’s next provincial general election is set for Oct. 5.

    “Regardless of who forms the next government, we’ll continue to advocate for stable regulation and a strong independent brokerage sector,” Fréchette says. “So, our focus is really going to be on continuity with whatever government comes into place later in the fall.

    “The government is more than just its leader.”

    That said, RCCAQ has had a constructive relationship with the Legault government, which has been responsive on several industry issues, Fréchette reports.

    For example, CAQ granted RCCAQ a $3.7 million subsidy to help brokerages invest in and digitize their operations with new technology tools. This allowed the broker association to build a technology knowledge base within the province and RCCAQ member firms.

    RCCAQ also worked with the provincial government to get direct broker access to things like DASH (Driver and Auto Search History), MVR (Motor Vehicle Records) and claims information.

    Previously in Quebec, brokers had to go through an insurer to gain access to the central motor vehicle accident database. “So now there is a mechanism for brokers to be able to get approved to get direct access…That increases broker efficiency and service quality.”

  • ICLR launches new, ‘democratized’ platform for Canadian natural hazard data

    ICLR launches new, ‘democratized’ platform for Canadian natural hazard data

    Woman working at home looking at charts on her computer monitor

    When it comes to natural catastrophe hazard maps, Canada is not exactly known to be data-rich.

    Catview, a new, centralized source of natural hazard data for Canada’s property and casualty insurance industry, is designed to fill that gap.

    Glenn McGillivray, managing director of the Institute for Catastrophic Loss Reduction (ICLR) — the research arm of Canada’s property and casualty insurance industry — spoke to Canadian Underwriter recently about the origins and development of Catview, a free resource that officially launched in February.

    “It just became obvious over the years that our member insurers were hungry for data,” McGillivray tells CU. “I once heard someone describe Canada as a ‘Third World country for data.’ We don’t have the kinds of data that you see in the US, for example.

    “The Government of Canada does some great stuff, but it’s all over the place. You have to know where to find it. It’s difficult to find, it’s difficult to download, and some companies don’t have even the ability to do anything with it once they get it….

    “Data is king. And we always try to make things simpler for people; in this instance, by collecting hazard data and making it available in one place.”

    CatView is a new, Google Maps-based geographic information system (GIS) platform that presents underwriting-grade, natural hazard data in visual maps for users across Canada. It’s designed to be an accessible, centralized resource for critical natural hazard information. Currently, it includes data layers for perils such as earthquakes, extreme wind, hail, wildfire, landslides and other natural hazards.

    Catview is designed for insurers, brokers, reinsurers, reinsurance intermediaries, all levels of government, lenders, researchers and others. The online portal will be updated regularly as new data becomes available, ensuring users always have access to the most current information.

    The data comes from three sources, McGillivray says.

    First, there is information from ICLR, drawing in part from the work of its chief engineer, Keith Porter. Second, the data sets incorporate scientific work done by researchers with whom ICLR consults. And finally, public data sets are now available in an accessible format.  

    Also in the news: Why Quebec’s broker association calls replacement insurance changes ‘problematic’

    McGillivary says he’s been encouraging insurance providers for more than a decade to hire GIS personnel to analyze hazard risks.

    GIS is a technology used to capture, manage, analyze and map all types of data, and connect it to a specific location on Earth. One key aspect of GIS is called ‘spatial data integration,’ allowing industry professionals to overlay different data layers — such as roads, buildings and satellite imagery — on top of hazard maps to analyze NatCat risks and exposures.

    “The people in this GIS role could be very busy,” McGillivray says. “I just heard a Big 5 [insurer] hired their very first GIS person.”

    How technical is the data? The metrics depend on the hazard.

    “Some of it’s pretty technical, such as on the earthquake side, but other stuff is fairly easy to understand,” says McGillivray. “You know where tornadoes have occurred, for example.”

    For McGillivray, Catview represents the pinnacle of one and a half years of work to collect and present this Cat-related information in a digestible presentation form. He adds the use of Google-Maps, which is free to users, is an attempt to ‘democratize’ the information.

    “I think there are a lot medium- and small-sized [insurance] companies in Canada that can use this sort of data,” he says. “They just don’t have access to really expensive tools, so I think this will be really helpful.”